State-Level Institutional Capacity Assessment
WY · Gov. Mark Gordon (R) · resource extraction dependent
Population
584K
GSP
$49B
Total Budget
$6B
Budget / capita
$9,418
Legal Regime
Home Rule
Binding Constraint
Anchor-Dependent · Primary constraint
Channeling Wyoming's $9B+ Permanent Mineral Trust Fund + 32% rainy-day fund (highest in US) + coal/gas severance surplus + F.E. Warren AFB nuclear-triad anchor into durable state-government capacity that survives the inevitable fossil-fuel transition. WY has CIO Young + ETS + AAA bond ratings + best-in-US rainy-day cushion — strong fiscal infrastructure. But resource-extraction archetype + 42% severance-tax revenue dependency makes WY the most fossil-fuel-dependent state economy in the US. Cluster C work positions the state to deploy mineral-trust earnings toward economic-diversification and digital service modernization, rather than competing on innovation infrastructure with larger states or pretending the coal economy returns.
6-Dimension Assessment
Wyoming is the smallest US state by population (584K). The economy is overwhelmingly resource-extraction-dependent: severance tax on coal, natural gas, and uranium provides 42% of state revenue (highest in US). Cheyenne (state capital, F.E. Warren AFB, regional services), Casper (oil services), Jackson (tourism, ultra-high-net-worth migration — Teton County has US's highest income inequality), and the energy basin (Powder River, Green River) anchor regional economies. 48% federal land share + Yellowstone + Grand Teton drive federal partnership flows. WY has CIO Young + ETS consolidation + AAA from all three rating agencies + 32% rainy-day fund (highest in US, fed by Permanent Mineral Trust Fund) + no state income tax (Constitutional). Federal-grants dependency (28.7%) is low because severance tax dominates. Gordon R-trifecta.
Peer States
North Dakota
Anchor-Dependentresource extraction dependent
Alaska
Anchor-Dependentresource extraction dependent
Montana
Systematizationrural low density
Peer states share structural profile (cluster, scale, archetype). Peer match is intra-level — states match states.
Innovation Pathway Recommendations
Building state-level institutional infrastructure for data-driven decision-making across major budget line items and policy decisions. Draws on the Results for America State Standard of Excellence framework, the Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative, and the state-government adaptations of the J-PAL / Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab evaluation methodology applied through state-level offices (Tennessee Office of Evidence and Impact, MN Performance Management, NC Office of Strategic Partnerships).
For Cluster C (Anchor-Dependent)
For Cluster C states, leverage the federal-lab or research-university anchor institution as evaluation capacity. National labs and federal research centers have rigorous evaluation expertise; state-anchor partnerships at the evaluation level cost less than building parallel state capacity.
H1 absorption pattern: state Office of Evidence and Impact stands up but produces reports no one reads; performance metrics defined by departments themselves, optimizing for legibility rather than impact. Or, R4A certification achieved but practices don't outlive the certification cycle — evaluation office staffed but not influential on actual budget decisions. The H2+ test is whether evidence actually changes the marginal-dollar allocation between programs from one budget cycle to the next.
Establishing and resourcing a state-level digital service team (NJ OOI, CA ODI, GA Technology Authority, MN IT Services, UT OOI, FL Digital Service) to modernize benefits delivery, citizen-facing portals, and inter-agency data exchange. Draws on the USDS / Code for America playbook applied at state scale, the Beeck Center's Digital Government Network (formerly Digital Service Network, merged early 2026), and Bloomberg's What Works Cities adaptation.
For Cluster C (Anchor-Dependent)
For Cluster C states, leverage the anchor institution's technical capacity — military bases have IT infrastructure, federal labs have engineers, research universities have CS programs willing to partner.
H1 absorption pattern: 'state digital transformation' becomes a multi-year ERP procurement that ports paper processes to PDFs without changing the underlying service experience. Healthcare.gov pre-rescue is the canonical case at federal level; CMS-funded MITA Medicaid IT projects are the state equivalent. The H2+ test is whether the state is building durable internal digital service capacity or just procuring vendor-led platforms.
K-12 School System
How the state’s public school system is governed, what it spends per pupil, and where it stands on the Nation’s Report Card.
State Community Context
Improve This Assessment
This is a living diagnostic. Spot something wrong or out of date? Suggest a sourced edit, or add context for other public innovators. Contributions are reviewed before they go live — sourced corrections are applied to the underlying data, improving it over time.
Data as of Compiled May 2026; USAFacts FY2023 · high confidence
Sources · Data as of Compiled May 2026; USAFacts FY2023 · high confidence
The Civic Infrastructure Diagnostic Framework’s structural elements — the four cluster labels, the six capacity dimensions, and the binding-constraint framing — are licensed under CC BY 4.0. Anyone may use or adapt them with attribution. Tool implementation and full article text © 2026 JTV Advisory LLC.